Karma: 1st edition vs 4th
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 1:18 am
Old GM taking a glance at the QuickStart, with a question about how karma plays.
In first edition, trolls were more powerful than windlings in the average round. When something was very important, however, and they both spent karma to boost the effort then the windling was the one to put your money on. Even if you wanted to play a bruiser, your ork had a certain edge on your troll because if they needed to they could burn through karma and be quite impressive (but of course, some people always wanted to play the troll or obsidiman LoL).
In our groups, having a d8 or even d10 vs a d4 was a gleeful part of not playing the troll or obsidiman.
My initial thought reading that now everyone has a d6 but some races have a larger pool is that some races can be slightly more impressive more often than others. I haven't played the new game, though. In actual play, does this feel like it levels the field between the races? Or is there some other factor I'm not aware of pertaining to this?
Thanks in advance!
In first edition, trolls were more powerful than windlings in the average round. When something was very important, however, and they both spent karma to boost the effort then the windling was the one to put your money on. Even if you wanted to play a bruiser, your ork had a certain edge on your troll because if they needed to they could burn through karma and be quite impressive (but of course, some people always wanted to play the troll or obsidiman LoL).
In our groups, having a d8 or even d10 vs a d4 was a gleeful part of not playing the troll or obsidiman.
My initial thought reading that now everyone has a d6 but some races have a larger pool is that some races can be slightly more impressive more often than others. I haven't played the new game, though. In actual play, does this feel like it levels the field between the races? Or is there some other factor I'm not aware of pertaining to this?
Thanks in advance!