[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: forum_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: mode
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: topic_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: forum_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: mode
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: topic_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: forum_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: mode
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: topic_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: forum_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: mode
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: topic_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: forum_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: mode
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: topic_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: forum_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: mode
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: topic_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: forum_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: mode
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: topic_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: forum_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: mode
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: topic_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: forum_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: mode
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: topic_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: forum_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: mode
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: topic_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: forum_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: mode
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: topic_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: forum_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: mode
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: topic_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: forum_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: mode
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: topic_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: forum_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: mode
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: topic_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: forum_id
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: mode
[phpBB Debug] PHP Notice: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/feed/controller/feed.php on line 319: compact(): Undefined variable: topic_id
FASA Games, Inc.FASA Games Forums and News 2025-06-02T15:54:29 https://fasagames.com/forum/app.php/feed/topic/1182 2025-06-02T15:54:292025-06-02T15:54:29 https://fasagames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1182&p=25738#p25738 <![CDATA[Re: Disbelieving damaging illusions]]> http://audiobookkeeper.ruhttp://cottagenet.ruhttp://eyesvision.ruhttp://eyesvisions.comhttp://factoringfee.ruhttp://filmzones.ruhttp://gadwall.ruhttp://gaffertape.ruhttp://gageboard.ruhttp://gagrule.ruhttp://gallduct.ruhttp://galvanometric.ruhttp://gangforeman.ruhttp://gangwayplatform.ruhttp://garbagechute.ruhttp://gardeningleave.ruhttp://gascautery.ruhttp://gashbucket.ruhttp://gasreturn.ruhttp://gatedsweep.ruhttp://gaugemodel.ruhttp://gaussianfilter.ruhttp://gearpitchdiameter.ru
http://geartreating.ruhttp://generalizedanalysis.ruhttp://generalprovisions.ruhttp://geophysicalprobe.ruhttp://geriatricnurse.ruhttp://getintoaflap.ruhttp://getthebounce.ruhttp://habeascorpus.ruhttp://habituate.ruhttp://hackedbolt.ruhttp://hackworker.ruhttp://hadronicannihilation.ruhttp://haemagglutinin.ruhttp://hailsquall.ruhttp://hairysphere.ruhttp://halforderfringe.ruhttp://halfsiblings.ruhttp://hallofresidence.ruhttp://haltstate.ruhttp://handcoding.ruhttp://handportedhead.ruhttp://handradar.ruhttp://handsfreetelephone.ru
http://hangonpart.ruhttp://haphazardwinding.ruhttp://hardalloyteeth.ruhttp://hardasiron.ruhttp://hardenedconcrete.ruhttp://harmonicinteraction.ruhttp://hartlaubgoose.ruhttp://hatchholddown.ruhttp://haveafinetime.ruhttp://hazardousatmosphere.ruhttp://headregulator.ruhttp://heartofgold.ruhttp://heatageingresistance.ruhttp://heatinggas.ruhttp://heavydutymetalcutting.ruhttp://jacketedwall.ruhttp://japanesecedar.ruhttp://jibtypecrane.ruhttp://jobabandonment.ruhttp://jobstress.ruhttp://jogformation.ruhttp://jointcapsule.ruhttp://jointsealingmaterial.ru
http://journallubricator.ruhttp://juicecatcher.ruhttp://junctionofchannels.ruhttp://justiciablehomicide.ruhttp://juxtapositiontwin.ruhttp://kaposidisease.ruhttp://keepagoodoffing.ruhttp://keepsmthinhand.ruhttp://kentishglory.ruhttp://kerbweight.ruhttp://kerrrotation.ruhttp://keymanassurance.ruhttp://keyserum.ruhttp://kickplate.ruhttp://killthefattedcalf.ruhttp://kilowattsecond.ruhttp://kingweakfish.ruhttp://kinozones.ruhttp://kleinbottle.ruhttp://kneejoint.ruhttp://knifesethouse.ruhttp://knockonatom.ruhttp://knowledgestate.ru
http://kondoferromagnet.ruhttp://labeledgraph.ruhttp://laborracket.ruhttp://labourearnings.ruhttp://labourleasing.ruhttp://laburnumtree.ruhttp://lacingcourse.ruhttp://lacrimalpoint.ruhttp://lactogenicfactor.ruhttp://lacunarycoefficient.ruhttp://ladletreatediron.ruhttp://laggingload.ruhttp://laissezaller.ruhttp://lambdatransition.ruhttp://laminatedmaterial.ruhttp://lammasshoot.ruhttp://lamphouse.ruhttp://lancecorporal.ruhttp://lancingdie.ruhttp://landingdoor.ruhttp://landmarksensor.ruhttp://landreform.ruhttp://landuseratio.ru
http://languagelaboratory.ruhttp://largeheart.ruhttp://lasercalibration.ruhttp://laserlens.ruhttp://laserpulse.ruhttp://laterevent.ruhttp://latrinesergeant.ruhttp://layabout.ruhttp://leadcoating.ruhttp://leadingfirm.ruhttp://learningcurve.ruhttp://leaveword.ruhttp://machinesensible.ruhttp://magneticequator.ruhttp://magnetotelluricfield.ruhttp://mailinghouse.ruhttp://majorconcern.ruhttp://mammasdarling.ruhttp://managerialstaff.ruhttp://manipulatinghand.ruhttp://manualchoke.ruhttp://medinfobooks.ruhttp://mp3lists.ru
http://nameresolution.ruhttp://naphtheneseries.ruhttp://narrowmouthed.ruhttp://nationalcensus.ruhttp://naturalfunctor.ruhttp://navelseed.ruhttp://neatplaster.ruhttp://necroticcaries.ruhttp://negativefibration.ruhttp://neighbouringrights.ruhttp://objectmodule.ruhttp://observationballoon.ruhttp://obstructivepatent.ruhttp://oceanmining.ruhttp://octupolephonon.ruhttp://offlinesystem.ruhttp://offsetholder.ruhttp://olibanumresinoid.ruhttp://onesticket.ruhttp://packedspheres.ruhttp://pagingterminal.ruhttp://palatinebones.ruhttp://palmberry.ru
http://papercoating.ruhttp://paraconvexgroup.ruhttp://parasolmonoplane.ruhttp://parkingbrake.ruhttp://partfamily.ruhttp://partialmajorant.ruhttp://quadrupleworm.ruhttp://qualitybooster.ruhttp://quasimoney.ruhttp://quenchedspark.ruhttp://quodrecuperet.ruhttp://rabbetledge.ruhttp://radialchaser.ruhttp://radiationestimator.ruhttp://railwaybridge.ruhttp://randomcoloration.ruhttp://rapidgrowth.ruhttp://rattlesnakemaster.ruhttp://reachthroughregion.ruhttp://readingmagnifier.ruhttp://rearchain.ruhttp://recessioncone.ruhttp://recordedassignment.ru
http://rectifiersubstation.ruhttp://redemptionvalue.ruhttp://reducingflange.ruhttp://referenceantigen.ruhttp://regeneratedprotein.ruhttp://reinvestmentplan.ruhttp://safedrilling.ruhttp://sagprofile.ruhttp://salestypelease.ruhttp://samplinginterval.ruhttp://satellitehydrology.ruhttp://scarcecommodity.ruhttp://scrapermat.ruhttp://screwingunit.ruhttp://seawaterpump.ruhttp://secondaryblock.ruhttp://secularclergy.ruhttp://seismicefficiency.ruhttp://selectivediffuser.ruhttp://semiasphalticflux.ruhttp://semifinishmachining.ruhttp://spicetrade.ruhttp://spysale.ru
http://stungun.ruhttp://tacticaldiameter.ruhttp://tailstockcenter.ruhttp://tamecurve.ruhttp://tapecorrection.ruhttp://tappingchuck.ruhttp://taskreasoning.ruhttp://technicalgrade.ruhttp://telangiectaticlipoma.ruhttp://telescopicdamper.ruhttp://temperateclimate.ruhttp://temperedmeasure.ruhttp://tenementbuilding.rutuchkashttp://ultramaficrock.ruhttp://ultraviolettesting.ru

Statistics:Posted by yankeeschic — Mon Jun 02, 2025 3:54 pm


]]>
2025-05-24T18:16:142025-05-24T18:16:14 https://fasagames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1182&p=23711#p23711 <![CDATA[Re: Disbelieving damaging illusions]]> отпр203.5вернshutAvanмузыSoulЗайцКолеМартрождSupeLikePeriSeenGreaDadoJaynEntiJeweWalkJustсекс
TondнароConcArtuMillBoilСедоHimmСереErniПатяавтоФрумБабкMoonЛибеPresопубпостLogaJimmSammScie
ВейхFrosAlbeGrieRichДэвибыйлAlmoHarpБегмВалеToutавтоUndeРасуSoulМарьDoriMusiDarkГринКиняСима
ElizСодеЯковоргаКоршИванSunrИбраHellEnjoоригGellтетрTimoZoneМоесGoinстраHarrDiamEverLathThat
ГимнJeweEverStopBoysLinwвойнРощиSterThirСодеLiveFreeKeepHandZoneJustBerlАдамПанфKadeLionKrea
JeweфарфсортNexuобребежеClimAdri2512HansУгарSwarZS-0рабоИталGiglShaw1921ARAGпотехороPosiJazz
ThalValiбраспразрабоязыкДиамSaleVoguWindФормKenwThisTrusкукууголJavaписаWillFantAgatБасоКрам
DigsтеатСодеСпешТалеантиTeleRobeAcadЛанскотоЯРайMusiWindКузнБеккспецПлохПугаJacqСергПашиКузи
SelmвозрЖураВыпуАнтоMaryСтриГрабStonThisавтоЧелнстихиздаLymaВолкPaulДубкРешеэкзаавтоNexuNexu
NexuNugeTracвозрBegiэкспАгенТрофАвернаствозрWillРезнtuchkasthisзани

Statistics:Posted by yankeeschic — Sat May 24, 2025 6:16 pm


]]>
2019-04-04T15:34:372019-04-04T15:34:37 https://fasagames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1182&p=9312#p9312 <![CDATA[Re: Disbelieving damaging illusions]]>
Tattered Rags wrote:
Thu Apr 04, 2019 2:11 am
They could have the player use cards. Playing cards where the color denotes true or not or spell cards that just shows whatever spell is being cast. Placed face down, then the GM has no idea and can just act like a player.
I'm playing an illusionist and I put a D4 somewhere another player can see it but the gm doesn't.
If it's an odd number, it is a true spell, if it isn't, it is an illusion.
After one of the gms (we take turns) failed with his choices 7 times in a row he stopped trying to disbelieve my spells :lol:

Statistics:Posted by Belenus — Thu Apr 04, 2019 3:34 pm


]]>
2019-04-04T02:11:172019-04-04T02:11:17 https://fasagames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1182&p=9308#p9308 <![CDATA[Re: Disbelieving damaging illusions]]>
Sharkforce wrote:
Thu Apr 04, 2019 1:20 am
well, sure, but figuring out what to disbelieve and what not to disbelieve is supposed to be tricky though... if it was easy, it'd be hard to have an entire discipline revolve around illusion magic :)
That's kinda the point of this whole thread, I think. There's a certain level of meta-gaming that goes on at a table. That can ruin an illusionist. Talk shifted to the idea of just always disbelieving (which is a bad idea).


Specifically the OP question was about NPCs. The GM has too high a knowledge about the players and what they're doing, but there are techniques to handle GM omniscience.

A good GM will have some idea of how a character might behave when faced with illusory magic. Some might never disbelieve (maybe they don't know), some might always disbelieve whatever the illusionist does. Those are the simple cases (and probably rare for the always-disbelieve person). But, assuming the NPC knows the other person is an illusionist, how is the GM to handle the sometimes-disbelief?

They could have the player use cards. Playing cards where the color denotes true or not or spell cards that just shows whatever spell is being cast. Placed face down, then the GM has no idea and can just act like a player.

For cases where that doesn't work, GMs can roll a die. Set a threshold depending on if they're more likely to believe or disbelieve, roll, and see what they do.

The key is simply don't be a jerk and always only disbelieve illusions.

Statistics:Posted by Tattered Rags — Thu Apr 04, 2019 2:11 am


]]>
2019-04-04T01:20:172019-04-04T01:20:17 https://fasagames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1182&p=9306#p9306 <![CDATA[Re: Disbelieving damaging illusions]]>
Telarus wrote:
Wed Apr 03, 2019 9:43 pm
Yeah, sure. But the paradox there is "Disbelieve what?" Everything all at once? Great, someone walks up and sticks a dagger in your belly. No need to be concerned, right? Yeah, well - it's real, your PD is 2, and no active defenses. And honestly, when a target does catch on to the short-term damaging Illusion magic and starts disbelieving the direct attack spells, it's really on the Illusionist to change tactics (including hitting them with a 'real' version, but not focusing solely on that).
well, sure, but figuring out what to disbelieve and what not to disbelieve is supposed to be tricky though... if it was easy, it'd be hard to have an entire discipline revolve around illusion magic :)

Statistics:Posted by Sharkforce — Thu Apr 04, 2019 1:20 am


]]>
2019-04-03T21:43:132019-04-03T21:43:13 https://fasagames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1182&p=9303#p9303 <![CDATA[Re: Disbelieving damaging illusions]]> Statistics:Posted by Telarus — Wed Apr 03, 2019 9:43 pm


]]>
2019-03-28T02:22:232019-03-28T02:22:23 https://fasagames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1182&p=9266#p9266 <![CDATA[Re: Disbelieving damaging illusions]]>
Telarus wrote:
Wed Mar 27, 2019 9:56 pm
I think you are misreading this slightly. In my opinion, it is _not_ a requirement that the GM stop and 'check with each target character' to see if they disbelieve before the mage gets to cast. That must be an active decision based on the totality of the situation, and it must be _declared_ before the mage makes the Spellcasting test. Really, this is only saying "you (as a player) cannot disbelieve after you see the dice explode". And as Mataxes said, this avoid another 'test' which complicates things. My general rule at the table is nobody can try to disbelieve if you have never encountered the casting character before (*exception - astral sight & illusion magic background yourself). After you have seen an illusion fail or create a paradox (_all_ tests made in reaction or when interacting with an illusion count as Sensing tests), you can be as paranoid as you want.
i would add (and suspect you would too) that knowing that there is an illusionist in the enemy group would be sufficient reason to disbelieve as well. like, if you've heard that there's a theran group in the area and they have a warrior, a weaponsmith, and an illusionist, and you then encounter a group that you believe to be that theran group, that is sufficient reason for someone to disbelieve.

Statistics:Posted by Sharkforce — Thu Mar 28, 2019 2:22 am


]]>
2019-03-27T21:56:542019-03-27T21:56:54 https://fasagames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1182&p=9265#p9265 <![CDATA[Re: Disbelieving damaging illusions]]>
Ferretmonger wrote:
Tue Mar 26, 2019 6:53 am
I'm talking about the part where a target can freely decide that a spell being cast is an illusion or not, even before the actual spell even being cast, and by doing so totally ignoring any of its effect, no roll needed whatsoever. So the poor Illusionist that just tried casting Phantom Flame just wasted two full rounds of weaving and casting.
Illusions with short durations are less subtle in their effects, and allow for a target to disbelieve what is happening. These types of illusions are mainly damaging spells, and it will be noted in the spell description if the spell can be disbelieved. If a target chooses to disbelieve one of these spells, they will not suffer any effect from the spell. If the spell is not an illusion, however, the target’s Mystic Defense is considered to be 2 for the purpose of determining the number of successes, as they have opened them-selves up to the magic. In addition, the target cannot use any active defenses (such as Steel Thought) to resist the spell.Illusionists have access to spells that are both real and illusory. The target must decide if they are going to disbelieve prior to the Spellcasting test being made. No test is required—if the spell is an illusion, it simply has no effect.
I'm stating that this automatic "ignore a spell before it is being cast" is way to powerful. Doing the math, which isn't really that hard in this case, shows that if the target known that if you're attacked by and Illusionist you might as well go ahead and always automatically disbelieve all damage spells being cast, since the True versions of the spell has its base damage lower than its illusory counterpart, meaning that even if you lower your MD to 2 you'd still walk away "winning" with much less incoming damage than if you would believe all damage spells, since you'd be automatically ignoring all spells with the Illusion keyword, as in the example above where two full rounds of weaving/casting just goes up in smoke. If I in the example above would've cast True Ephemeral Bolt instead I would have had two guaranteed damage sources that can't be disbelieved, no matter what, and even though the damage is lower than its illusory counterpart it is still 100% guaranteed damage.
I know what I would choose, ten times of ten.

I just want to understand why this has been added? And please prove me wrong in my assumptions if I've missed some vital parts in this.
I think you are misreading this slightly. In my opinion, it is _not_ a requirement that the GM stop and 'check with each target character' to see if they disbelieve before the mage gets to cast. That must be an active decision based on the totality of the situation, and it must be _declared_ before the mage makes the Spellcasting test. Really, this is only saying "you (as a player) cannot disbelieve after you see the dice explode". And as Mataxes said, this avoid another 'test' which complicates things. My general rule at the table is nobody can try to disbelieve if you have never encountered the casting character before (*exception - astral sight & illusion magic background yourself). After you have seen an illusion fail or create a paradox (_all_ tests made in reaction or when interacting with an illusion count as Sensing tests), you can be as paranoid as you want.

Statistics:Posted by Telarus — Wed Mar 27, 2019 9:56 pm


]]>
2019-03-27T18:36:132019-03-27T18:36:13 https://fasagames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1182&p=9263#p9263 <![CDATA[Re: Disbelieving damaging illusions]]> Statistics:Posted by Slimcreeper — Wed Mar 27, 2019 6:36 pm


]]>
2019-03-27T02:46:482019-03-27T02:46:48 https://fasagames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1182&p=9255#p9255 <![CDATA[Re: Disbelieving damaging illusions]]>
~sunglasses~

Illusionists are ephing dangerous?

I'll see my self out.

Statistics:Posted by Karhald — Wed Mar 27, 2019 2:46 am


]]>
2019-03-26T19:56:122019-03-26T19:56:12 https://fasagames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1182&p=9254#p9254 <![CDATA[Re: Disbelieving damaging illusions]]>
Ephing believer
percentage of time / damage step / average damage
  • .4167 / 0 / 0
  • .5833 / 10 / 5.833
Total: 5.833 damage on average.

Apologies, True Ephemeral Bolt is 4 damage more on average if someone always disbelieves vs. someone never disbelieving Ephemeral Bolt.

Statistics:Posted by Tattered Rags — Tue Mar 26, 2019 7:56 pm


]]>
2019-03-26T14:21:582019-03-26T14:21:58 https://fasagames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1182&p=9253#p9253 <![CDATA[Re: Disbelieving damaging illusions]]>
Ferretmonger wrote:
Tue Mar 26, 2019 6:53 am
Doing the math, which isn't really that hard in this case, shows that if the target known that if you're attacked by and Illusionist you might as well go ahead and always automatically disbelieve all damage spells being cast, since the True versions of the spell has its base damage lower than its illusory counterpart, meaning that even if you lower your MD to 2 you'd still walk away "winning" with much less incoming damage than if you would believe all damage spells, since you'd be automatically ignoring all spells with the Illusion keyword, as in the example above where two full rounds of weaving/casting just goes up in smoke.
Your math is off. On average, the difference between a target always disbelieving and hit by True Ephing Bolt vs. a non-disbeliever hit by regular Ephing Bolt is 3.5 points of damage more against the disbeliever.

I used anydice.com to put my statistics together. Use output [explode d8] to make the dice explode.

Assume an MD of 8 on the target and the Illusionist has WIL 7, Spellcasting 9 (basically the example character in the back of the PG).

When doing the calculations, percentage is how often the given damage step is likely to appear. We'll simplify things by not rolling the damage step but simply use it as is and multiply it by the percentage of time it appears. Summing it up across the different damage steps for the attack should yield the average damage output per round.

Ephing believer
percentage of time / damage step / average damage
  • .4167 / 0 / 0
  • .3802 / 10 / 3.802
  • .1329 / 12 / 1.5948
  • .0487 / 14 / 0.6818
  • .0215 / 16 / 0.344
Total: 6.4226 damage on average

True ephing non-believer
percentage of time / damage step / average damage
  • .0208 / 0 / 0
  • .2917 / 8 / 2.3336
  • .4383 / 10 / 4.384
  • .1584 / 12 / 1.9008
  • .0630 / 14 / 0.882
  • .0277 / 16 / 0.4432
Total: 9.9436 damage on average

This assumes a crit-failure results in no damage to the target. The numbers become significantly worse, as well, if the target MD is higher.

The benefit is realized in that first round for the always disbeliever when the first ephing bolt vanishes. Three rounds later, disbelieving is now a detriment if the Illusionist switched to True Ephing. If the fight doesn't last that long, then the whole question is moot anyway.

edit: for spelling

Statistics:Posted by Tattered Rags — Tue Mar 26, 2019 2:21 pm


]]>
2019-03-26T08:04:352019-03-26T08:04:35 https://fasagames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1182&p=9248#p9248 <![CDATA[Re: Disbelieving damaging illusions]]>
i mean, they have to decide before the spellcasting test is done, so unless they have some way in advance of knowing exactly what spell you're going to cast, they don't know if you're casting a real ephemeral bolt or a fake one (or, for that matter, that you're even casting *any* version of ephemeral bolt, or any illusion spell whatsoever). i mean, heck, the first one you cast, they shouldn't even have any way of knowing you are specifically an illusionist in many cases (again, unless you announce in a loud voice that you're an illusionist in advance of casting your spells, and then back it up with conclusive evidence - on a related note, if you make a point of wearing dark, tattered clothes and have a bunch of skulls and bones on your person, you can probably fool people into assuming that you're a nethermancer, just as one example. you're an illusionist, it is pretty much literally your calling in life to turn their preconceptions against them).

and if they disbelieve the real one, they will be taking plenty of damage. consistently. no steel thought to dodge, and you'll average an extra success most likely even at lower circles (at higher circles, when your opponents can easily have mystic defense in excess of 15, automatically disbelieving means your true ephemeral bolt will score an extra 2-3 success more often than not).

and then, once they're always assuming you're using the true version, you can switch to the fake version, and still deal decent damage.

if you find that they still aren't motivated to not always disbelieve, then drop a mind fog on them or some other debilitating spell that costs them more than damage, but which is still real (the nukes aren't the only non-illusions in an illusionist's arsenal).

on the other hand, if you mean that you run into problems with AoE where groups of enemies all disbelieve except for a single one with the highest mystic defense, i would argue that people who have coordinated to rely on someone else's mystic defense aren't really disbelieving at all, are they? i mean, if i say i believe it's perfectly safe to walk on a perfectly clear glass platform but i absolutely *refuse* to set one foot on it unless i'm wearing a safety harness attached by a rope to a secure point, am i really being honest in saying that i believe it's perfectly safe?

(note: people shouldn't even necessarily know they're a target of the spell until after they've decided to disbelieve or not... so if your GM keeps abusing this highly questionable cheese-fest of a tactic, start aiming your spells to not hit the highest defense target. and if they only do it when you start threading a big spell, which again, seems pretty sketchy on their part unless there is a legitimate reason they know you're an illusionist as opposed to any other discipline, remember that true ephemeral bolt has an extra thread option for an additional target... and you can always pick the ones that keep disbelieving...)

if that still fails, your pursuit of mastery in the illusion discipline may be aided by dabbling in another discipline. if you pick up elementalist magic (either through multi-discipline rules or human versatility), when people start believing you may find it easier to make them regret it as a result of your enhanced repertoire of 100% real effects. you may even be able to fill the gap with appropriate thread items... the frost pouch, for example, has some very real cold spells that allow you to use spellcasting (if you have it) to duplicate a handful of cold-related spells (as a bonus, from more than one discipline, so you can really keep them guessing). from the players companion, there are the firewind bracers, the lightning mace, nightscar, the staff of vylir, and twilight staff. if none of those are suited, you could talk to your GM about looking for a thread item that is suited to your needs.

Statistics:Posted by Sharkforce — Tue Mar 26, 2019 8:04 am


]]>
2019-03-26T06:53:172019-03-26T06:53:17 https://fasagames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1182&p=9247#p9247 <![CDATA[Re: Disbelieving damaging illusions]]> before the actual spell even being cast, and by doing so totally ignoring any of its effect, no roll needed whatsoever. So the poor Illusionist that just tried casting Phantom Flame just wasted two full rounds of weaving and casting.
Illusions with short durations are less subtle in their effects, and allow for a target to disbelieve what is happening. These types of illusions are mainly damaging spells, and it will be noted in the spell description if the spell can be disbelieved. If a target chooses to disbelieve one of these spells, they will not suffer any effect from the spell. If the spell is not an illusion, however, the target’s Mystic Defense is considered to be 2 for the purpose of determining the number of successes, as they have opened them-selves up to the magic. In addition, the target cannot use any active defenses (such as Steel Thought) to resist the spell.Illusionists have access to spells that are both real and illusory. The target must decide if they are going to disbelieve prior to the Spellcasting test being made. No test is required—if the spell is an illusion, it simply has no effect.
I'm stating that this automatic "ignore a spell before it is being cast" is way to powerful. Doing the math, which isn't really that hard in this case, shows that if the target known that if you're attacked by and Illusionist you might as well go ahead and always automatically disbelieve all damage spells being cast, since the True versions of the spell has its base damage lower than its illusory counterpart, meaning that even if you lower your MD to 2 you'd still walk away "winning" with much less incoming damage than if you would believe all damage spells, since you'd be automatically ignoring all spells with the Illusion keyword, as in the example above where two full rounds of weaving/casting just goes up in smoke. If I in the example above would've cast True Ephemeral Bolt instead I would have had two guaranteed damage sources that can't be disbelieved, no matter what, and even though the damage is lower than its illusory counterpart it is still 100% guaranteed damage.
I know what I would choose, ten times of ten.

I just want to understand why this has been added? And please prove me wrong in my assumptions if I've missed some vital parts in this.

Statistics:Posted by Ferretmonger — Tue Mar 26, 2019 6:53 am


]]>
2019-03-26T02:36:332019-03-26T02:36:33 https://fasagames.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1182&p=9246#p9246 <![CDATA[Re: Disbelieving damaging illusions]]>
Ferretmonger wrote:
Mon Mar 25, 2019 11:52 am
I would really love for a dev to comment on this as I feel that a big part of the Illusionist Discipline has been severely merged, or at least not explained properly. In the our campaign, as soon as there is high circle opponents, or dragons, horrors etc, the only reasonable attack I have is True Ephemeral Bolt. Fun times. Why can't it just go back to being a sensing test, so Iat least can use False Sight from time to time (in combat that is). Previous versions of ED even had talent crisis as a potential drawback when casting too many non-illusory spells, but now it's a necessity for me if I want to have any at all in combat, especially in high circle environments.

@Mataxes ?
I'm not sure what you're talking about. If you cast (for example) Ephemeral Bolt on a target, and deal enough damage to trigger a Knockdown test, the target's Knockdown test is considered a sensing test. If they tried using Steel Thought against the spell, that would count as a sensing test. Either (or both) could potentially be modified based on False Sight.

As a First Circle spell, Ephemeral Bolt has a base DN of 16 (Player's Guide, pg. 266). If the target rolls 16 or better on their Knockdown test (or Steel Thought test), they sense it is an illusion (regardless of what the actual DN of the Knockdown/Steel Thought test might be).

If you have False Sight, the result of the False Sight test increases that DN as indicated in the talent description. So if you scored 3 successes on the False Sight test, it increases that sensing DC by +6 to 22.

We haven't removed sensing tests. We did away with active Disbelief tests.

Statistics:Posted by Mataxes — Tue Mar 26, 2019 2:36 am


]]>