Questions and answers...

[Telarus_KSC]

Nice. I think you made an extra "blank" post, as there's one without content or a tag showing just above this week's post.

[Mataxes]

That is the case! Thanks for picking up on that.

[Psychman]

[kosmit]

Please drop the Mystic Defense and come back to Spell Defense

[Utsukushi]

I like Mystic Defense - it's more consistent, with Mystic Armor; more applicable, since not all things that target it are spells; and easier for abbreviating, since we now have PD, MD, and SD, instead of PD, SpD, and SoD.

When I first read that change, I thought, "Oh, yeah. Why didn't we all do that sooner?"

Thanks, Mataxes! I'm very glad to hear the Horrors are still a significant part of things. Er -- this might be too fussy, but if editing the blog is easy enough.. apparently my keyboard jumped in the middle of my post; could you fix the "jus finet" to "just fine"?


(I'm not OCD. <twitch>)

[j0hn]

[kosmit]

Hmmm... To be honest I've never thought you guys got problem with abbreviations in english which is my bad, sorry. Pointed that out it's true it will look better as Mystic Defense.

Polish abbreviations are OF(PS), OM(SpD), OS(SoD) and PF(PA), PD(MA).

[Cthulhu_Wakes]

I've got one that's been bouncing around in my brain a while: will we see the classic thread items revised? Brought in line with the new rules, perhaps ironed out a bit to make them somewhat more logical? Senor Weeks' blog points out some of the rather lackluster or nonsensical building that has gone into these items.

Another question (because I'm greedy) is will we see newer Named thread items or more robust rules to build our own?

[Mataxes]

In fact, Morgan is starting work on that very thing (revising thread items) this week. The work and analysis he's done on his blog is a large part of the reason he's on the team.

[kosmit]

So now thread items will stick more to rules presented in GM and won't be overpowered?