Search found 289 matches
- Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:03 am
- Forum: For Game Masters
- Topic: Ice Shackles - need some clarification
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4387
Re: Ice Shackles - need some clarification
thanks arma that was a thing i wasnt sure of.
- Wed Dec 14, 2011 7:23 am
- Forum: For Game Masters
- Topic: Ice Shackles - need some clarification
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4387
Re: Ice Shackles - need some clarification
i have read the 229 section and just applying a harried penalty + the "no movement allowed" is working out as i did last night (i used an overhelmed penalty in place of the harried, acting on the ice and mace chains spell, that is more or less similar: harried + damage > overhelmed + no da...
- Wed Dec 14, 2011 7:17 am
- Forum: For Game Masters
- Topic: Ice Shackles - need some clarification
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4387
Re: Ice Shackles - need some clarification
i was tempted to say "you are totally immobilized" so the mechanics will be 1) cant move 2) cant attack 3) cant defend (no free defensive actions) but the problem remains on 1) how is PhiDef ? the same ? dont think so, since is dex based and in that context Dex is irrilevant. A "basic...
- Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:36 pm
- Forum: For Game Masters
- Topic: Ice Shackles - need some clarification
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4387
Ice Shackles - need some clarification
Ice Shackles Step Number: Rank + WIL Action: Standard Type: Magical Water—Cold. The creature makes an Ice Shackles Test against the Spell Defense of any single target within its line of sight. If the test succeeds, the target is wrapped in bands of magical frost. Ice Shackles melt after a number of ...
- Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:44 am
- Forum: For Game Masters
- Topic: fireblood
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4518
Re: fireblood
i usually let the players use FB until the "clear win" condition is up that is, at the start of a round only 1 opponent is up and they are outnumbering him 3:1 at that point, they can declare the last use of fb if the conditions remain at the start of the following round, they cant use it ...
- Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:37 am
- Forum: For Game Masters
- Topic: fireblood
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4518
Re: fireblood
this is very interesting. so the (rightly for game balance) Fireblood during a fight has a great effect if used when NOT wounded, and has diminishing returns if used when wounded (and that means you are already on the down curve of the returns). also is very useful because in this way it gives the F...
- Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:09 am
- Forum: For Game Masters
- Topic: fireblood
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4518
fireblood
Is a talent, based on a recovery test. since the wound penalties are effecting "action and effect tests" with the exception of recovery tests, my question is wich is the correct interpretation ? 1) fireblood is not affected by the wound penalty being a recovery test 2) fireblood is affecte...
- Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:02 am
- Forum: For Game Masters
- Topic: second attack - a doubt
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3157
Re: second attack - a doubt
perfect, thanks.
we ruled that aswell, the momentum attack definition was the tie-breaker in this case.
Good the point on frenzy toh.
we ruled that aswell, the momentum attack definition was the tie-breaker in this case.
Good the point on frenzy toh.
- Mon Dec 05, 2011 10:00 pm
- Forum: For Game Masters
- Topic: second attack - a doubt
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3157
second attack - a doubt
we had a doubt tonight.. second attack (talent or skill) can be used on a target that isnt the target of the main attack ? it means, can i attack, kill my opponent, move and attack again another target using second attack ? or, direct my main attack on the opponent A then use second attack on oppone...