So, I was the one who wrote the request to delete the line on Eastern Dragons being keen on decorum being some sort of influence on or reflection of Japanese and Chinese culture. Because the section is an out of character description of a part of the setting, I didn't take it for in-setting chatter or speculation. I still feel that it doesn't fit very well where it is, even with the changes; the transition to calling it out as a common prejudice of Victorians is incredibly awkward, given that it wasn't supposed to be an in-setting chapter to begin with.
(I may also be incredibly harsh on Victorian-era folk, but I also tend to assume poorly of them on the front to begin with, given the hotbed of racial pseudoscience provided by European and Euro-descended cultures of the time. Cannot wait until a certain magical comeuppance in North America, hope it isn't a ritual provided by Thais this time.)
Companion Commentary
General discussion on 1879.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2020 9:16 pm
Return to “Product Line General Discussion”
Jump to
- FASA Games, Inc
- ↳ General Discussion
- ↳ Gamer to Gamer
- ↳ Site Feedback
- Earthdawn
- ↳ For Players
- ↳ For Game Masters
- ↳ Online Play
- ↳ West Marches II
- ↳ Characters
- ↳ Resources
- ↳ Rumors
- ↳ Play-by-Post
- ↳ West Marches (Archived)
- ↳ Characters
- ↳ Resources
- ↳ Product Discussion
- ↳ Legends of Barsaive
- ↳ Adventurer's Journal
- 1879
- ↳ For Players
- ↳ For Gamemasters
- ↳ Roleplaying General Discussion
- ↳ Miniatures General Discussion
- ↳ Product Line General Discussion
- ↳ Ha'Penny Pie
- ↳ Grand Tales and Glorious Schemes
- ↳ Play-by-Post Games
- Demonworld
- ↳ Product Discussion
- ↳ For Players
- ↳ For Gamemasters
- ↳ Miniatures 3e
- ↳ Legacy Edition
- Noble Armada
- ↳ Rules Discussion
- ↳ Product Discussion
- ↳ Noble Command
- Fading Suns Revised
- ↳ For Players
- ↳ For Gamemasters
- ↳ Product Discussion
- Sixth Element